Fieldlock receipt
56.4%
Top 2 (Satisfied, Very satisfied) · by Preferred brand of packing material : 2nd choice · 380 people · weighted by wt · 56.6% unweighted · effective base 366.5
- Question in the file
- “Satisfaction with Harborline on : Print quality”
- Question as asked
- “Satisfaction with Harborline on : Print quality by Preferred brand of packing material : 2nd choice”
- Study and wave
- Harborline buyer tracker · Wave 2
- Counted by
- Test Agency, on Fieldlock, 9 November 2026. Left the desk 9 November 2026.
- Column
- Att_1
- Codebook fingerprint
- 0fcf7b10323591fc…
- Model
- none. The figure was counted from the response file; no language model wrote it.
- Receipt hash
- 0320ed4d37d57ab164d85b0184b0afe007b0cffab26cb48ce9188587379eeb0c
Hashing the receipt in your browser…
The check runs here, on this page. Nothing is sent anywhere.
What this page proves
The receipt was written by the engine at the moment of counting and hashed. The hash on the figure you were given names this receipt; your browser has just hashed it again. It proves the figure, the wording, the base and the wave have not been changed since. It does not re-run the count: that needs the response file, which stays with Test Agency. How receipts are built: nextfluent.com/method.