Fieldlock receipt
56.4%
Top 2 (Satisfied, Very satisfied) · by Rank these in order of importance when choosing packing : Strength · 380 people · weighted by wt · 56.6% unweighted · effective base 366.5
- Question in the file
- “Satisfaction with Harborline on : Print quality”
- Question as asked
- “Satisfaction with Harborline on : Print quality by Rank these in order of importance when choosing packing : Strength”
- Study and wave
- Harborline buyer tracker · Wave 2
- Counted by
- Test Agency, on Fieldlock, 9 November 2026. Left the desk 9 November 2026.
- Column
- Att_1
- Codebook fingerprint
- 0fcf7b10323591fc…
- Model
- none. The figure was counted from the response file; no language model wrote it.
- Receipt hash
- 781add66db768156fc66ba359dc8296fc343a430fd2efd10d4a5009a6392cf31
Hashing the receipt in your browser…
The check runs here, on this page. Nothing is sent anywhere.
What this page proves
The receipt was written by the engine at the moment of counting and hashed. The hash on the figure you were given names this receipt; your browser has just hashed it again. It proves the figure, the wording, the base and the wave have not been changed since. It does not re-run the count: that needs the response file, which stays with Test Agency. How receipts are built: nextfluent.com/method.